The joint Study Group on ‘Biodiversity and Financial Stability’ launched by NGFS and INSPIRE publishes an Interim Report | Banque de France
The joint Study Group on ‘Biodiversity and Financial Stability’ – launched in April 2021 by the NGFS and the International etwork for Sustainable Financial Policy Insights, Research, and Exchange (INSPIRE) – published an Interim Report entitled “Biodiversity and financial stability: building the case for action”.
The Study Group is co-led by Dr Ma Jun (Chair of NGFS Workstream on Research and Special Advisor to the Governor of the People’s Bank of China) and Professor Nick Robins (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environments), and comprises around 30 NGFS members and observers, and around 30 INSPIRE researchers, from academia, civil society groups and think-tanks. The document is published as part of the “NGFS Occasional Papers” series and, therefore, the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily represent those of the NGFS.
The report finds that there is growing evidence that biodiversity loss could have significant economic and financial implications, because the decline of ecosystem services poses physical risks for the economic actors that depend upon them. These actors also face transition risks from policies designed to halt biodiversity loss, such as the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, expected to be agreed at COP 15 conference in Kunming, China, next spring.
“Global policymakers are now becoming increasingly aware of the consequences of biodiversity loss. It is highly encouraging that NGFS and INSPIRE deliver their interim report on the risks of biodiversity loss for the economy and the financial system and the implications for central banks and supervisors ahead of Biodiversity COP-15”.Frank Elderson, Chair of the NGFS and member of the ECB’s Executive Board
This potential financial instability means that central banks and financial supervisors could start to better assess the risks associated with the loss of biodiversity. The authors recommend four steps that central banks and financial supervisors can tackle the problem:
- First, they can begin building the skills, capacities, tools and cooperation to address biodiversity-related economic and financial risks;
- Second, they can assess the dependencies and impacts of their financial institutions – through the economic activities they support – on ecosystem services and biodiversity. They can become more familiar with existing biodiversity-economy models and develop ad hoc methodological approaches that better capture the risk of impacts cascading through economic and financial systems;
- Third, they could signal to the financial institutions that they supervise, other economic actors and policymakers the importance of understanding the risks arising from their dependencies and impacts on biodiversity;
- Last, the authors say central banks and financial supervisors could, within the remit of their mandates support governments’ efforts to reverse biodiversity loss, in particular regarding the implementation of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework by addressing financial risks and preparing the financial infrastructure required for nature-positive financing.
“This report shows the severity of the macroeconomic consequences of biodiversity loss and profiles the increasing efforts by central banks and supervisors to understand the implications for both financial institutions and for the system as a whole. As we head towards the COP15 on biodiversity and COP26 on climate, it’s clearer than ever that these two imperatives need to be addressed in an integrated way, thereby helping to reduce the rising physical and transition risks from environmental depletion that are now facing the financial system.”Professor Nick Robins
“A growing number of central banks and financial supervisors recognise the risks that climate change poses to financial stability. Biodiversity loss poses risks of similar, and perhaps greater magnitude to many countries, while it is also clear that climate and biodiversity are interlinked and often self-reinforcing issues. Central banks and supervisors need to work on actions to guide financial institutions to protect biodiversity, including via requirements for them to assess the impact of investment activities on biodiversity and to disclose impact information. However, central banks and regulators face considerable challenges – in terms of data, methodologies, tools and capacity – in understanding and responding to the risks posed by biodiversity. There is significant potential for bodies such as the NGFS to help central banks and financial supervisors cooperate in addressing these challenges.”Dr Ma Jun
This Interim Report sets the stage for a final report from the Study Group, due to be published in early 2022. That report will explore in further detail linkages between biodiversity loss, the macroeconomy and the financial system, drawing on existing research and leading practice. The final report will more comprehensively consider options for central banks and financial supervisors to address the micro and macroprudential risks that biodiversity loss poses as well as set out a research agenda.
Find the Study Group interim report entitled “Biodiversity and financial stability: building the case for action” here.